An Engineering and Management Approach to Optimizing the Behavior of Strip Footings on Geocell-Reinforced Saturated Sand: Analyzing the Effect of Embedment Depth, Reinforcement Width, and Geocell Geometry

Authors

    Manesht Maleki Vasegh Department of Civil Engineering, Ki.C., Islamic Azad University, Kish, Iran.
    Vahid Rostami * Department of Civil Engineering, Ha.C., Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran. rostami.vahid@iau.ac.ir
    Hamidreza Rabieefar Department of Civil Engineering, STB., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Keywords:

Geocell Reinforcement, Saturated Sand, Strip Footing, Bearing Capacity Ratio (BCR), Load–Settlement Behavior, Embedment Depth and Reinforcement Width

Abstract

Improving the performance of shallow foundations on problematic soils such as saturated sand requires integrating precise engineering design with informed management of influential parameters. This research examines geocell systems from an engineering-management perspective to provide solutions that simultaneously enhance bearing capacity and optimize economic and executional efficiency. In a systematic laboratory study, the effect of three key parameters with engineering significance (embedment depth, reinforcement width, and geocell geometry) on the behavior of a strip footing on saturated sand was investigated. These parameters were considered as design management variables to quantify their impact on the system's performance and economic indicators. Forty-nine tests were conducted, including an unreinforced reference case, under uniform loading. The results showed that optimal management of embedment depth at shallow depths (u/B = 0.25) combined with engineered selection of reinforcement width (L/B ≥ 3) can increase the Bearing Capacity Ratio (BCR) up to 4.2 times. From the perspective of material management and technical selection, geocells with greater height and smaller cell aperture (G3) were identified as the superior engineering option. This study demonstrates that through engineering design based on testing and intelligent management of effective parameters, reinforced systems can be achieved that are both technically efficient and economically and executionally optimal. The findings provide a framework for managerial decision-making in selecting configuration, materials, and execution methods in real-world projects.

References

Binquet, J., & Lee, K. L. (1975). Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 101(12), 1241-1255. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000219

Chen, P., Chen, Z., Guo, Z., Wang, T., & Yang, W. (2025). Experimental studies on the axial compression performance and bearing capacity of pultruded GFRP tube-concrete-round steel tube double-skin hollow columns.

Chen, Q., & Abu-Farsakh, M. (2015). Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of strip footings on reinforced soil foundation. Soils and Foundations, 55(1), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.01.005

Dash, S. K. (2010). Influence of relative density of soil on performance of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 22(5), 533-538. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000040

Dash, S. K., Krishnaswamy, N. R., & Rajagopal, K. (2001a). Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 19(4), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00006-1

Dash, S. K., Krishnaswamy, N. R., & Rajagopal, K. (2001b). Strip footing on geocell-reinforced sand beds with additional planar reinforcement. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 19(8), 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00022-X

Fragaszy, R. J., & Lawton, E. (1984). Bearing capacity of reinforced sand subgrades. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 110(10), 1500-1507. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:10(1500)

Huang, C. C. (2016). Ultimate bearing capacity of saturated reinforced horizontal ground. Geosynthetics International, 23(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00027

Huang, C. C., & Tatsuoka, F. (1990). Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 9(1), 51-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(90)90005-W

Moghaddas Tafreshi, S. N., & Dawson, A. R. (2010). Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and with planar forms of geotextile reinforcement. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(1), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.003

Najjar, M., Indraganti, M., & Furlan, R. (2025). The Role of Building Geometry in Urban Heat Islands: Case of Doha, Qatar. Designs, 9(3), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs9030077

Pokharel, S. K., Han, J., Leshchinsky, D., Parsons, R. L., & Halahmi, I. (2010). Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(6), 570-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.002

Shin, E. C., & Das, B. M. (2000). Experimental study of bearing capacity of a strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geosynthetics International, 7(1), 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.7.0166

Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical Soil Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172766

Tianzheng, F., Clara Saracho, A., & Haigh, S. K. (2023). Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) for soil strengthening: A comprehensive review. Biogeotechnics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100002

Wang, K. D., Wu, S. F., & Chu, J. (2023). Mitigation of soil liquefaction using microbial technology: An overview. Biogeotechnics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bgtech.2023.100005

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

Submitted

2025-10-04

Revised

2026-01-24

Accepted

2026-01-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Maleki Vasegh, M., Rostami, V., & Rabieefar, H. (2026). An Engineering and Management Approach to Optimizing the Behavior of Strip Footings on Geocell-Reinforced Saturated Sand: Analyzing the Effect of Embedment Depth, Reinforcement Width, and Geocell Geometry. Journal of Resource Management and Decision Engineering, 1-15. https://www.journalrmde.com/index.php/jrmde/article/view/245

Similar Articles

41-50 of 56

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.