Presenting a Model for Maximizing Decision Implementation in Governmental Organizations Based on the Development of the Zone of Indifference

Authors

Keywords:

Maximizing decision implementation, zone of indifference, employees, Trade Promotion Organization of Iran

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop a model for maximizing decision implementation in governmental organizations based on the development of the zone of indifference. In terms of purpose, this research was applied, and in terms of nature, it was categorized as a mixed-methods study with a sequential exploratory design grounded in the pragmatism paradigm. In the qualitative phase, which was conducted using an inductive approach and interpretivist philosophy, the statistical population consisted of academic experts and senior managers of the Trade Promotion Organization of Iran. Sampling was conducted through purposive (judgmental) and snowball methods, and theoretical saturation was achieved after 15 semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis strategies (descriptive, interpretive, and overarching coding) with the aid of MAXQDA software, leading to the development of the conceptual model. In the quantitative phase, the model was validated through an expert panel using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI), based on the opinions of five subject-matter specialists and experts. Quantitative data analysis was conducted using SPSS software. The findings indicated that four principal drivers, including “professional legitimacy,” “value congruence,” “economic exchange,” and “organizational trust,” play a key role in expanding the zone of indifference. The core of the model explained the transition process from “cognitive resistance” to “intelligent compliance,” in which replacing bureaucratic supervision with trust reduces friction costs. The results also demonstrated that individual factors such as “risk aversion” and organizational factors such as “directive conflicts” and “managerial instability” function as constraining barriers to the zone of indifference. Ultimately, the proposed model demonstrated that the expansion of the zone of indifference leads to positive outcomes at three levels: individual (revitalization of psychological capital), organizational (enhanced productivity), and national (facilitation of foreign trade).

References

Abdi, N., Bait, S., Hasnain, A., Lauria, S., Savigliano, R., Scarcia, Y., & Schiraldi, M. (2022). Prioritize special economic zones establishment through a multi-criteria decision-making approach: A case study on the federal states of Somalia. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790221100075

Adnan, M., Ahmad, S., & Khan, R. (2022). Barriers to strategy implementation in public sector organizations: A systematic review. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 12(2), 45-67.

Adnan, M., Saputra, N., Syamsir, S., & Mulia, R. (2022). Implementation of decision making in the public sector in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v10i2.ps01

Alsuhaimi, M. (2025). Implementing data-driven decision-making in Saudi Arabia's public sector: A path to progress. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2025.03.012

Barnard, C. I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press.

Bellander, S., Eriksson, M., Sundqvist, J., & Ghazinour, M. (2025). A Gap Between Decision and Execution: An explorative study of the Swedish Police's experiences in implementing the 2015 counter-terrorism strategy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-025-09616-1

Birken, S., Bunger, A., Powell, B., Turner, K., Clary, A., Klaman, S., Yu, Y., Whitaker, D., Self, S., Rostad, W., Chatham, J., Kirk, M., Shea, C., Haines, E., & Weiner, B. (2017). Organizational theory for dissemination and implementation research. Implementation Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0592-x

Clark, E., Burnett, T., Blair, R., Traynor, R., Hagerman, L., & Dobbins, M. (2024). Strategies to implement evidence-informed decision making at the organizational level: A rapid systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10841-3

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1964). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall.

Danaeefard, H., & Eslami, A. (2010). Examining organizational silence: Causes and consequences. Management Research in Iran.

Elbanna, S., Andrews, R., & Pollanen, R. (2016). Strategic planning and implementation success in public service organizations: Evidence from Canada. Public Management Review, 18(7), 1017-1042.

Hagen, J., Meyer, D., & Schultze, U. (2023). Stakeholder coalition and the zone of indifference: A new perspective on organizational acceptance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(3), 201-225.

Jahanshahi, A. (2010). Examining factors affecting employees' organizational indifference. Human Resource Management Quarterly.

Maio, A., Musmanno, R., & Vocaturo, F. (2022). Unbiased decision making in location-routing problems with uncertain customer demands. Soft Computing, 27, 12883-12893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06785-7

Papsiene, P. (2024). Theoretical modeling of organizational reflex in human resource management from the perspective of organizational biological approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02644-y

Pitts, D. W. (2010). Modeling the zone of indifference: Employee response to administrative authority. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 341-356.

Robert, T., & Carl, D. (2015). Classic theories of organizational behavior and their contemporary applications. Management History Quarterly, 10(4), 88-105.

Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. Macmillan.

Taheri Lari, M., Rezvani, M., & Khayati, M. (2016). Explaining the relationship between management styles and human resource productivity with the mediating role of decision-making quality. Executive Management Journal.

Teng, S., Lee, L., & Chew, E. (2010). Integration of indifference-zone with multi-objective computing budget allocation. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.008

Vyas, L., & Luk, S. C. Y. (2010). Fractionated implementation: The role of the zone of indifference in public policy. Public Policy and Administration, 25(4), 311-329.

Yu, C., Matta, A., & Semeraro, Q. (2020). Group decision making in manufacturing systems: An approach using spatial preference information and indifference zone. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 55, 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.02.007

Zhou, Y., Andradottir, S., Kim, S., & Park, C. (2025). Indifference-Zone Relaxation Procedures for Finding Feasible Systems. ArXiv, abs/2509.04514. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2509.04514

Downloads

Published

2027-05-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Vakili Ghaserian, S. ., Salavati, A., & Sahabi, J. . (2027). Presenting a Model for Maximizing Decision Implementation in Governmental Organizations Based on the Development of the Zone of Indifference. Journal of Resource Management and Decision Engineering, 1-14. https://www.journalrmde.com/index.php/jrmde/article/view/317

Similar Articles

11-20 of 255

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.