<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Journal of Resource Management and Decision Engineering</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume></Volume>
      <Issue>In Press</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>09</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>A Hybrid Statistical–MCDM Framework for Integrated Risk Prioritization and Sustainability Assessment in Construction Supply Chains: Bridging Local Data with Global Theory</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>A Hybrid Statistical–MCDM Framework for Integrated Risk Prioritization and Sustainability Assessment in Construction Supply Chains: Bridging Local Data with Global Theory</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>21</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>18</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p class="Abstract" style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-GB" style="letter-spacing: -.3pt;"&gt;This study aimed to develop and empirically validate a hybrid statistical–multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework for identifying, prioritizing, and managing sustainability-related risks and strategic interventions in construction supply chains within the context of the Qeshm Free Trade Zone. A practical descriptive–inferential research design was employed using a structured Delphi survey administered to 33 experts, including project managers, engineers, contractors, consultants, and supply chain professionals involved in major construction projects in Qeshm. Following expert consensus, a questionnaire measuring economic, social, environmental, and structural risks, as well as key supply chain success drivers, was developed and validated. Reliability was confirmed through Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. One-sample t-tests were conducted to determine statistically significant risk factors. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) was applied to prioritize critical supply chain drivers and capture interdependencies among criteria, while the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used to rank sustainability-oriented management strategies based on multiple performance criteria. The results revealed that economic risks, including supplier financial challenges, material price volatility, exchange-rate fluctuations, transportation costs, and delay-related expenses, were statistically significant. Environmental risks, such as pollution, resource depletion, non-renewable resource usage, and environmental compliance issues, also demonstrated significant effects. ANP results indicated that Material Supply Management was the most influential driver (weight = 0.553), followed by Design and Engineering Management (0.294), Manufacturing and Production Management (0.094), and Workforce Supply and Safety Management (0.059). At the sub-criterion level, provision of high-quality domestic building materials (0.304) and optimal foundation design (0.215) received the highest priorities. TOPSIS analysis identified sustainable supply chain management software (0.8962) and sustainable material selection (0.8664) as the most effective strategic interventions. The integration of statistical analysis, ANP, and TOPSIS provides a robust decision-support framework for sustainable construction supply chain management. The findings demonstrate that economic volatility, environmental pressures, material quality, and engineering effectiveness are dominant determinants of sustainable performance. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Sustainable Construction</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Construction Project Management</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Sustainable Supply Chain Management</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Analytic Network Process</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Risk Prioritization</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.journalrmde.com/index.php/jrmde/article/download/360/310</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
